Posts tagged ‘assumptions’
Before I could enter first grade at the age I did, I had to be tested. Thoroughly. Twice, once by a psychologist and once to ensure I could understand the teaching materials. Remember, this is Oregon and that was the 1950s.
I already knew everything in first grade except math. I had problems with dyslexia for the first three years of school, although I only mentioned it once. [b:d, B:D, e, f and s are the ones I recall] Math tied me in knots until I [the word does not exist, however it is something I learned to do then and now constantly do; it is very similar to using an abacus to do math; also some relationship to ‘haiku’ [:actually, words/ideas contracted as much as possible+1] and origami (as well as using fractals software).
By 3 years later, I had learned to lie about what I knew. I had to claim to know less. That was just after my adoption.
Two years later, I tested above high school graduate.
Two years later, I tested as being able to challenge any course in Bachelor-level college except math. My parents wouldn’t allow it. At fifteen I was offered a scholarship all the way through Dordt college. My adopted parents wouldn’t allow it.
I needed one credit and one class to graduate when I entered my senior year of high school, and by the time I graduated from high school I had begun to live in rage. I had been promised to graduate from bootcamp E3 rather than E2 with a guaranteed A school. I would be able to become an officer (I turned that down, incidentally).
And in 1972 I was forced to become a ‘traffic checker’. I was too young. I wasn’t an E5 (I was a fucking E3). I was on my first enlistment. The DNC-5 said that all messages would be spelled correctly with correct punctuation and grammar. I enforced that. Someone pointed out to me I’d lose my privileged job if I kept on doing that with George Steele’s messages (look up Admiral, Commander Seventh Fleet, say, 1973). They would start checking me for drugs, for instance, instead of warning me about tests. I became more of a stickler. They gave me a higher security clearance and for about three years I knew…EVERYTHING about the Vietnam war. There was a minor addendum to that, no one else except the admiral did, which meant if I whispered one thing–if I screwed up once–if I ever lost control…why then, you see, they would know it was me. Out of thousands of military personnel. I had spies in foreign ports try to befriend me–I had our own spies test me. I was warned I’d be followed and then I was.
And in 2012 they finally more or less admitted it. “We don’t know precisely what Mr. [Charles] knew.”
By the way, Snowden is and was an idiot.
I’ve been working on things. Primarily it’s been Network Storage. I have a working Lenovo Iomega ix4-300d as well as a somewhat pretend NAS because it’s 4 TB and not only default but unstoppably RAID 0. RAID 0 is bad because when your drive fails (either of them, at least) all your data is gone. For non-intensive use that’s basically all right. Modern disks (hard drive type) actually don’t have a default spin rate any more, they simply go to rest. Since you can feel drives spinning, if you’re brave and have a somewhat gentle touch, try it; pick one up while it’s flickering (the drive light, d…arn it) and you’ll find you can feel the drive that said light indicates. [This tends not to be true of the slower 3600 RPM drives; usual drives are 7200; there are faster-spinning drives available but oddly enough they are more susceptible to shock. I am never sardonic. Never lie, either. You’d be astonished at how perfect I’m not. I mean, am.]
Partially because of the Netgear pretend-NAS when I was installing the ix4, I had some problems. There was also something else that was probably the OS (Windows) conflicting with the native OS of the NAS itself. I would presume. I explained it in fair detail and they suggested a factory reset when in fact it’s now working fine. Let sleeping dogs lie where they may and tip toe amongst the dung.
Homegroup finally works, even with a Windows 8.1 among the bunch. That means I actually have a bunch of computers working as meant, and I can access data pretty well on one if I can’t on another. A case in point is Kindle, the application, not working on this machine. It does on others, however. I’m also finally unlikely to lose any data again; I do after all have that years’–old data saved that I’ve never gone through until now. It’s been transferred from computer to computer, you see.
So I’m back online to an extent at least. I am however writing assiduously which means offline a lot; publishers don’t like pre-published writing.
They just didn’t vet carefully enough. That means first of all they didn’t bother to buy computer access to search criminal records. There is also a possible implication as to whether it is accidental, however there is not enough data as yet. Remember, there are a number of things that are held out as desirable but which are both sinful and illegal. Remember, attention is attention. So; I’m pointing out both that I’m dubious about the cable network involved and fascinated by the polarity no one saw here, the innate contradiction. We scream for the absence of surveillance and yet here it is being decried. But the problem itself is never discussed.
This is at a time where we have crossed the line from maintenance of order into the casual intrusion of deadly force into any and all police-civilian confrontations. In Oregon and Nevada police are the notable sources of death. [This will immediately be blamed on many things, but a cop tried to warn me in 1991. I wish I’d listened and taken a ride with him in his patrol car. At least I’ve learned now from not learning; discounting something because of its source means that you assume yourself to be able to distinguish absolute truth through extremely relative means. If Rose dies I may well occasionally spend time with the homeless; certainly I’m going to sell this house and buy an Airstream. *Or something very similar.] Police are people. They even have relationships with civilians. Fracture one. There are more people than police. If most of the people are at the point of demanding new government, something will break. More than that a lot of the citizens will die.
There will be a number of excuses tendered for that. However, education at police universities changed, obviously. The entire philosophy being employed progressively employed; I myself was a victim of profiling. I was successfully accused of using crystal meth (while driving? anyway, apparently I was high but)–none in my bloodstream but I suppose they explained that away. *I’m very deaf and at the time didn’t have hearing aids. I also gave up straining to hear. After having the idiot deputy smiling at me cheerfully while testifying (I accidentally whispered in a shriek “But why didn’t you blood test me” thinking it would be inaudible; I got lectured about how the judge didn’t like disturbances–oh, and “But it’s not procedure“) and actually hating for the first time in a long time I thought it better to wait. Even though I had been attempting to ‘stay under the radar’, I’d been victimized. I was followed for no reason for about a mile and then made a mistake out of nervousness and was ticketed–sheriff’s dept again. Then I got the first part of compensation as I recall for PTSD. And the sheriff’s kind attentions stopped. Of course, come to think of it, if that was anything to do with a guy named John Thompson, who was a friend of sorts I visited fairly frequently–it would have stopped about then. The guy died.
My point is that we as a population evince a complete ambivalence toward the police; supportive at one moment and killing them the next. The police ‘respond’–and act–in the same way.
Our opponents at Tours have returned. This is not the time for internal dissension.
Behaviorism basically states that observed species tend to learn solely with respect to their environment.
Observably social interaction modifies this behavior.
It is debatable whether any phenomena could conclusively be taken to establish anything save absolute determinism on many levels. Ironically, that includes beliefs. More ironically yet that is one of the true points of both Walden II and 1984.
In many ways content is restricted by form and most especially format. If meaning were to lie outside language it would have to lie outside a social context, for instance. If there were no meaning outside language (outside the communicable, outside that confining form of language) there could be no change. That there is change and that it isn’t gracefully accepted by society makes for a constant tension.
I just looked at KGB in Wikipedia. It’s better than whoever that moron is that’s saying the KGB is declaring “checmate on the U.S. [whatever]”. That’s exactly like saying that Stalin is. Fine. Out of curiosity, who’s your medium and what’s your point?
There are a few points I know to be wrong and I can’t really draw the line between what’s commonly known and what isn’t–even though that article contradicts some things that were commonly known in the intelligence-related world. Nuff said.